A Heart-felt Chat
The Crown Diamond
diagram
is proof that all alphabets of the West share a
common
source
with the
emblems of Sinaitic Hebrew. All these can be mapped on the Crown Diamond
grid, which is as David’s buckler. Its matrixes demonstrate that the
alphabets of man are not devised by man. They are fractals of creation’s
geometry. The alefbet of the Moses Script codifies these spiritual
qualities more clearly than any other alphabet.
The majestic power of God’s strange work on earth has brought us to this
present-day period of great sorrow and great promise, as nation states
rise against each other without hope of reproachment, crumbling from
within as they war because of the rot within their roots. We shudder at
the h weeping and wailing
lly that resounds within the lower reaches of the firmament at the
approach of the
Morning
Star
and his angels.
Our la is not a man or an angel,
though he is the substance of both. la is breath: invisible spirit
jwr. Beyond all form,
hla is not a creature or like
unto any creature. Where there is resemblance, creatures are
likened unto him.
la is reality: he is what
he is when he chooses to be what he is: this is the meaning of
the great
IAM.
He is not a father, a mother, son, or daughter, a husband or a wife:
HaShem is the sum and substance of all these roles and functions. His
essence is reflected within each of us; for it is his good pleasure to
give of himself all he has fashioned us to receive.
Can a woman encompass a man? Our bodies are the mother of what we are
becoming. They are our cocoons. We are
caterpillars: cherished fire worms whose
sparks fall from heaven to earth when it is expedient for our transition
by transformation. The gospels make it clear that, though it is given to
man once to die, we are more than man; for one of
several
pathways opens to us at the time of physical dissolution.
We face a second death, which we can suffer with or without loss,
depending on how we lived our lives; and after judgment, we may not
taste of the second death at all, passing from life unto life—from one
incarnation to the next. Further, if we had overcome the need of going
in and out by means of incarnation—from heaven to earth and back again,
we will be invited to take our places as pillars in the perfect temple
of HaShem. But until mortality puts on immortality, we will endure as
caterpillars that do not perish within the temporal fires of heaven or
in their cooler counterparts on earth. Sparks
of divine fire that fell from heaven, we are caught up in the winds of
earth, which fan the ember within, causing it to burn with urgency as it
contributes to the purification
of our souls. The inner fire may smolder as adamah
hmda—the earthen motes
da we raise
m
in living our lives
h—but the eretz
xra will ignite like stardust as its concepts explode
a within, lifting up our minds
r
unto transformation
x.
Adamah and eretz transform by the same flame
ca. The fire of heaven bathes as it liquifies, the molten heat
redeeming as it purifies; for the Lord
a of Glory
c
hovers above the throne centered in its haven of fire, and we little
ones are mesmerized by the faces of the Presence. Moshe and Eliyahu
stand nearby, sharing the depth of their perspectives and singing
praises, while Rebbe Y’shua stands at the throne’s right hand, reading
from the Book of Life and making intercession for everyone the book
names.
The fires of earth burn more slowly than heaven’s fire, but they sear
and cauterize spiritual wounds, sealing against reinfection. All but one
are written in the Book of Life; and that one isn’t a man, in the
conversational sense, but is called the “son of perdition.” Metaphorical
wco
Esau is called both
Edom
mda and
mwda: mwda
because he hungered
w
after insubstantial da things
m with greater
a passion
d
than for the nourishment
w
that comes from
m heavenly food
w. He preferred
d the reflection
m to the projection
a. Edom is an archetypical foe
greater than any individual; for Obidiah and Jeremiah wrote that Esau
wco, the bitter manipulator who
stood by and watched without concern as his brother Jacob
bqoy
faltered under duress— the voracious principality called Esau— will
drink from the cup prepared for him from the beginning; and he shall
become as though he had never been.
The memory of our troubles on earth will be snatched from our minds and
cast into the bottomless; for Esau, the husk of that which we are
becoming, is the record of every bad deed and every unwholesome thought
or craven desire that any of us has ever entertained in our lives on
earth. He is the inward hoard of wickedness; and when he is taken away,
our sorrow will turn into tears of joy as Rachab’s
scarlet
thread—
the pull of her lifeline— lifts us over
Yircho’s
walls of obstruction, clearing the way for the victory of HaShem as HaMashiyach makes
the march to Yerushaliem.
If “God the father” were time, rather than the creator of
time, we would perceive in him the faces of the
past, the present, and the future, none of which exists in eternity.
They exist in creation, however; and creation speaks of the hidden
things of
la. As the faces of time are lost in eternity, so they are lost in
our present reality. Each
of these distinctions is made, entertained, or expected only within the
present; for within our reality, there is only the “present,” but
of course it just passed. We compartmentalize the faces of time because
of its seamless essence and for our convenience; for time consists of an
ineffable sense of presence that can’t be grasped, even though it can be
understood; and attempting definition of the present is to mumble in the
past; for the urgency of time is its future.
In
the natural order, messiah declares, “I am the door
d—the
dalet
d, the
number
four d, a metaphor that speaks of
the future. In thinking of the dalet, a common error is to count its
points and to overlook its open center, a feature that complicates the
number considerably. “If you had seen me,” said the Man of Four, “you
had seen the father also,” meaning, by parable, that you would have
looked beyond past, present, and future and would have seen time, the
reality of that of which appearance is a token.
All that we are incorporates the timeline of past, present, and future,
which defines the reality of temporal realms at every scale. To think
only in terms of the past is to know little of its substance; for it the
past must be retrieved into the present for consideration. The present
is the dimension in which our minds operate,
making learning of HaShem difficult because we waste the present
unraveling knots of the past. Even corpses find no rest in the present;
for remains are soon commandeered by other organisms.
We are made in the likeness of
la:
our souls are vivified by the Breath of Life, which is as the flow of
time. One with his likeness inwardly, our physical bodies are fashioned
to function in accordance with time’s image: their features and
functions are designed to underscore and illustrate the corporeal
experience of the flow of time. Down to the microbial level, all aspects
of the body, with its organs, faculties, functions, and processes,
operate within the harmonic cadences of their times, which testify of
the organization and integration of spiritual faculties and, by
extrapolation, of God’s likeness. Our feet, hands, eyes are as God’s
“faces,” his expressions: they reveal
myhla by the image they build in
our minds; and they edify us through their seamless operations, which
teach us of God’s unity because we experience its likeness as we observe
its coordination within our own physical and spiritual processes.
Time is a crucial element of routine matters; for example, it’s time
that enables us to visualize what is overheard in another room. Not
there, we measure the sounds by projection of our physical faculties and
functions to compile a visualization of what is heard in time. Many such
things teach us of God’s nature; for all things in any realm are either
reflections (the image) or projections (the likeness) of the spirit of
la.
All that is or shall ever be had its beginning in the mind of
myhla. All was created to bring our minds back to
la, but
la does not have a mind as we think of mind.
la is spirit, and minds are a
projection of spirit, even as consciousness is the reflection of spirit. |
||||||
|