Failure is not an Option
These are
serious matters, and I’m like a jester lighting fires and walking in the
sparks I conjure. Let’s agree, for the moment, that Lucifer had been
perfect until, out of nowhere, a random fault arose in his thoughts,
profaning the pristine whole and refashioning him as a victim by opening
the
floodgates of his inner being to all kinds of imperfection.
How might he
have defended himself against this invasive force that had caused him to
fall short?
He was
the covering cherub! What had he missed? Even for him to have
contemplated a scenario by which he could become a victim would have
been faithless, an error in and of
We know
that Lucifer acted in faith by two points: the father said he was
perfect in all his ways; and the Son of the Morning held his silence
when the judgment came upon him. He didn’t chafe at the father’s words.
He accepted the father’s righteousness without question. He must
therefore have believed all things would work together to the benefit of
all because he trusted in the father’s faithfulness, his merciful
goodness, his grace. There’s a diligence that is not born of faith, but
of a fearful desire for self-preservation, just as there’s a resignation
that is a man’s ultimate expression of faith; for greater love has no
man than this, that he lays his life down for his friends.
The
gospels warn that willful discipline, though seeming right, can even war
against faith by nullifying the father’s counsel. If Lucifer had
calculated that his performance gave him reason to boast and that he
could maintain his competence through willpower, a plainly pejorative
judgment against the imperfection found in him would have been
forthcoming; because if he had taken the bit between his teeth and had
looked to himself on behalf of himself, he would have essentially dared
hla
to intervene, and the fiery cherub would have set heaven ablaze with
posturing and glib gossip as every angel looked to his own advantage
without regard for his fellows. If a claim of diligence had been acceptable, Lucifer would have established justification for pride, opening himself and all others to far greater upheaval as the dual focus on creature and creator became adopted by all. Had he shelved dependence on hla to depend on a heroic self-diligence, which he would then have to maintain on an eternal scale, he could not long have forestalled disaster; for the ever-growing, dead-weight burden of such a defense would prove to be too cumbersome, even for the Light Bearer. When things are conditional, the imbalance of duality develops and worsens.
The
gospels warn that willful discipline, though seeming right, can even war
against faith by nullifying the father’s counsel. If Lucifer had
calculated that his performance gave him reason to boast and that he
could maintain his competence through willpower, a plainly pejorative
judgment against the imperfection found in him would have been
forthcoming; because if he had taken the bit between his teeth and had
looked to himself on behalf of himself, he would have essentially dared
hla
to intervene, and the fiery cherub would have set heaven ablaze with
posturing and glib gossip as every angel looked to his own advantage
without regard for his fellows. |
||||||
|